Professor Masayuki Murayama, Ph.D. ●EDUCATION 1979-81 1978-79 1973-81 1973 Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program, School of Law, University of California, Berkeley (1981 Ph.D. Candidate) LL.M. Program, School of Law, University of California, Berkeley Graduate Program in Law and Political Science, University of Tokyo LL.B., University of Tokyo ●ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2005 1997 1997 1996 1993 1987 1981 1987-2005 Professor, School of Law, Meiji University Visiting Researcher, Institut fuer Rechtstatsachen Forschung und Rechtssoziologie, Freie Universitaet, Berlin Visiting Researcher, CNRS Centre de Sociologie des Organisations, Paris Visiting Researcher, Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, Oxford University Professor, Faculty of Law and Economics, Chiba University Associate Professor, Faculty of Law and Economics, Chiba University Research Assistant, Faculty of Law and Economics, Chiba University having taught at Sophia (Jochi) University, St. Paul (Rikkyo) University, Hokkaido University, Hosei University, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo Metropolitan University and Yokohama National University ●DEGREE Ph.D. in Law (University of Tokyo, Sociology of Law) LL.M. (University of California, Berkeley) ●PUBLICATIONS 2010 2009 2009 2007 2002 2000 1998 1998 1994 1993 1992 Convergence from Opposite Directions? Characteristics of Japanese Divorce Law in Comparative Perspective, Harry N. Scheiber and Laurent Mayali (eds.), Japanese Family Law in Comparative Perspective, Robbins Collection, University of California School of Law, pp.61-98. Japanese Disputing Behavior Reconsidered, Kuo-chang Huang (ed.), Empirical studies of judicial systems 2008, Academia Sinica, pp.261-298. Expanding Access to Lawyers: The Role of Legal Advice Centers, in Rebecca L. Sandefur (ed.), Access to Justice Experiences of Problems and Disputing Behaviour in Japan, MEIJI LAW JOURNAL Vol.14. (PDF) The Role of the Defense Lawyer in the Japanese Criminal Justice System, Malcolm Feeley and Setsuo Miyazawa (eds.), The Japanese Adversary in Context: Controversies and Comparisons, Palgrave. (With Johannes Feest) Protecting the Innocent Through Criminal Justice: A Case Study from Spain, Virtually Compared to Germany and Japan, David Nelken (ed.), Contrasting Criminal Justice: Getting from Here to There, Ashgate Publishing, 49-75. Does a Lawyer Make a Difference? − Effects of a Lawyer on Mediation Outcome in Japan, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 13, 52-77 The Penal Control of Traffic Accidents in Japan, in Ewoud Hondius(ed.), Modern Trends in Tort Law, 113-133, The Right to Counsel: Deficit and Opportunity for Criminal Justice in Japan, in Precaire Waarden: Liber Amicorum voor Prof. mr. A.A.G. Peters, 325-333. Patrol Police Activities in Changing Urban Conditions − The Case of the Tokyo Police, in Vincenzo Ferrari and Carla Faralli(ed.), Laws and Rights, Vol.2, 133-160. Postwar Trends in the Administration of Japanese Criminal Justice: Lenient but Intolerant or Something Else?, Journal of Japan-Netherlands Institute 4, 221-246.